Johnny Ray Elliott v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 21, 2014
Docket05-14-00067-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Johnny Ray Elliott v. State (Johnny Ray Elliott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnny Ray Elliott v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed as Modified and Opinion Filed October 21, 2014

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00067-CR

JOHNNY RAY ELLIOTT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F06-66580-I

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Francis and Myers Opinion by Justice Francis

Johnny Ray Elliott appeals from the adjudication of his guilt for assault involving family

violence, with a prior assault-family violence conviction. The trial court assessed punishment,

enhanced by one prior felony conviction, at imprisonment for ten years. In two issues, appellant

contends the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt should be modified to accurately reflect his

plea to the motion to adjudicate and the name of the State’s attorney. We modify the trial court’s

judgment adjudicating guilt and affirm as modified.

The judgment adjudicating guilt recites appellant pleaded true to the motion to adjudicate

and the attorney representing the State during the proceedings was Justin McCants. The record, however, shows appellant pleaded not true to the allegations in the motion to adjudicate, and that

Rontear Farmer represented the State during the proceedings. Thus, the judgment is incorrect.

We sustain appellant’s issues.

We also note the judgment incorrectly recites terms of a plea bargain agreement. We

modify the judgment adjudicating guilt to show: (1) the attorney for the State is “Rontear

Farmer;” (2) the plea to the motion to adjudicate is “not true;” and (3) to delete “10 years TDCJ”

from the “terms of plea bargain” section. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State, 865

S.W.2d 26, 27–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529–30 (Tex.

App.—Dallas 1991, pet. ref’d).

As modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 140067F.U05

/Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE

‐2‐ Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JOHNNY RAY ELLIOTT, Appellant Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. No. 05-14-00067-CR V. F06-66580-I). Opinion delivered by Justice Francis, Chief THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justice Wright and Justice Myers participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is MODIFIED as follows:

The section entitled “Attorney for State” is modified to show “Rontear Farmer.”

The section entitled “Plea to Motion to Adjudicate” is modified to show “Not True.”

Delete “10 Years TDCJ” from section entitled “Terms of Plea Bargain.”

As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.

Judgment entered October 21, 2014

‐3‐

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Asberry v. State
813 S.W.2d 526 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Bigley v. State
865 S.W.2d 26 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Johnny Ray Elliott v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnny-ray-elliott-v-state-texapp-2014.