Johnny Paul Penry v. James A. Lynaugh, Interim Director, Texas Department of Corrections
Opinion
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
The Supreme Court has concluded that the jury was not provided with a vehicle for responding to the mitigating evidence of Penry’s mental retardation and abused background, and the Court has ordered that Penry be resentenced. Penry v. Lynaugh, — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 2934, 106 L.Ed.2d 256 (1989).
Accordingly, the district court’s judgment denying the writ is reversed, and the cause is remanded to that court for an order complying with the directions of the Supreme Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
882 F.2d 141 (Johnny Paul Penry v. James A. Lynaugh, Interim Director, Texas Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.