Johnny Paul Penry v. James A. Lynaugh, Interim Director, Texas Department of Corrections

882 F.2d 141, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 13013, 1989 WL 90692
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 15, 1989·No. 87-2466·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before REAVLEY and GARWOOD, Circuit Judges. *

PER CURIAM:

The Supreme Court has concluded that the jury was not provided with a vehicle for responding to the mitigating evidence of Penry’s mental retardation and abused background, and the Court has ordered that Penry be resentenced. Penry v. Lynaugh, — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 2934, 106 L.Ed.2d 256 (1989).

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment denying the writ is reversed, and the cause is remanded to that court for an order complying with the directions of the Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnny Paul Penry v. James A. Lynaugh, Interim Director, Texas Department of Corrections, 882 F.2d 141, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 13013, 1989 WL 90692 (5th Cir. 1989).

882 F.2d 141 (Johnny Paul Penry v. James A. Lynaugh, Interim Director, Texas Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Goodman
816 S.W.2d 383 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)