Johnny Partain v. James H. Maples
This text of Johnny Partain v. James H. Maples (Johnny Partain v. James H. Maples) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-11-00157-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE TRACTOR SUPPLY CO. OF TEXAS, LP D/B/A TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY #1104, TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY, AND VICTOR FONSECA
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Garza, Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1
Relators, Tractor Supply Co. of Texas, LP d/b/a Tractor Supply Company #1104,
Tractor Supply Company, and Victor Fonseca, filed a petition for writ of mandamus on
March 22, 2011. The parties to this original proceeding have now filed an “Agreed
Motion to Dismiss in Aid of Settlement.” According to this motion, the parties have fully
and finally compromised and settled all matters of fact and things in controversy
1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions). between them. Accordingly, the parties request that we dismiss this original proceeding
with prejudice.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the agreed motion to dismiss,
is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Accordingly, we GRANT the motion
to dismiss and DISMISS this original proceeding with prejudice.
It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 4th day of May, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Johnny Partain v. James H. Maples, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnny-partain-v-james-h-maples-texapp-2011.