Johnny Partain and Teresa Partain v. Keith Livesay and Livesay Law Offices

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 7, 2005
Docket13-04-00451-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Johnny Partain and Teresa Partain v. Keith Livesay and Livesay Law Offices (Johnny Partain and Teresa Partain v. Keith Livesay and Livesay Law Offices) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnny Partain and Teresa Partain v. Keith Livesay and Livesay Law Offices, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

                              NUMBER 13-04-451-CV

                         COURT OF APPEALS

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                         CORPUS CHRISTI B EDINBURG

JOHNNY PARTAIN AND

TERESA PARTAIN,                                                                         Appellants,

                                                             v.

KEITH LIVESAY AND

LIVESAY LAW OFFICES,                                                                Appellees.

  On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

                                        of Hidalgo County, Texas.

                       MEMORANDUM OPINION

                  Before Justices Yañez, Castillo, and Garza

                            Memorandum Opinion by Justice Garza


This is a restricted appeal from a judgment dismissing appellants= claims against appellees.  Review by restricted appeal is available if (1) the appeal is filed within six months after the final judgment is signed, (2) by a party to the lawsuit, (3) who did not participate in the actual trial, and (4) error is apparent from the face of the record.  Quaestor Invs., Inc. v. Chiapas, 997 S.W.2d 226, 227 (Tex. 1999); see also Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(c), 30.  Appellants contend that the foregoing requirements have been established, but appellees maintain that appellants participated in the hearing that resulted in the judgment of which they now complain.  No reporter=s record was filed by appellants, and this Court is therefore unable to determine which party is correct.  We dismiss the appeal because appellants have failed to establish their entitlement to review by restricted appeal.  Appellees= motion for sanctions is denied.

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

Justice

Memorandum Opinion delivered

and filed this the 7th day of July, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Quaestor Investments, Inc. v. State of Chiapas
997 S.W.2d 226 (Texas Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Johnny Partain and Teresa Partain v. Keith Livesay and Livesay Law Offices, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnny-partain-and-teresa-partain-v-keith-livesay--texapp-2005.