Johnny Mansolo v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Johnny Mansolo v. State

DecidedJanuary 11, 2017

Docket10-16-00252-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Johnny Mansolo v. State (Johnny Mansolo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnny Mansolo v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00251-CR No. 10-16-00252-CR

JOHNNY CANDIDO MANSOLO, Appellant v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 2015-447-C1 & 2015-49-C1

ORDER

Johnny Candido Mansolo has filed a Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion

for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc requesting an additional 30 days to file a motion

for rehearing and rehearing en banc.1 Mansolo’s motion is granted. A motion for

1 Mansolo is pro se. Although his appointed attorney filed an Anders brief and was released from representing Mansolo, see Mansolo v. State, Nos. 10-16-00251-CR & 10-16-00252-CR, 2016 Tex. App. Lexis 13224 (Tex. App.—Waco Dec. 14, 2016, no pet. h.) (publish), Mansolo is permitted to pursue this extension rehearing is due 30 days from the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Motion granted Order issued and filed January 11, 2017

and a motion for rehearing without an attorney. See Scott v. State, 301 S.W.3d 700 (Tex. App.—Waco 2009, order).

Mansolo v. State Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI