Johnny Mae Mitchell v. Osair, Inc.

816 F.2d 681, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5167, 70 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 832, 1987 WL 37153
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 20, 1987
Docket86-3547
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 816 F.2d 681 (Johnny Mae Mitchell v. Osair, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnny Mae Mitchell v. Osair, Inc., 816 F.2d 681, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5167, 70 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 832, 1987 WL 37153 (6th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

816 F.2d 681

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Johnny Mae MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
OSAIR, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 86-3547.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 20, 1987.

Before JONES, KRUPANSKY and NELSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Defendant-appellant OsAir, Inc. appealed orders entered by the district court on March 5 and May 12, 1986. Plaintiff-appellee Mitchell moved to dismiss the appeal as premature. OsAir filed a short brief in response, and then supplemented it with a letter stating that Mitchell's position "seems to be well taken," suggesting that the motion to dismiss the appeal "should probably be granted," and stating that the appellant "does not oppose" dismissal of the appeal. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
816 F.2d 681, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5167, 70 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 832, 1987 WL 37153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnny-mae-mitchell-v-osair-inc-ca6-1987.