Johnny Lee Turner, Jr. v. the State of Texas

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
DecidedJuly 14, 2026
Docket03-25-00271-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Johnny Lee Turner, Jr. v. the State of Texas (Johnny Lee Turner, Jr. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnny Lee Turner, Jr. v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-25-00271-CR

Johnny Lee Turner, Jr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 20-1067-K368, THE HONORABLE SARAH SOELDNER BRUCHMILLER, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Johnny Lee Turner, Jr. pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea bargain to

evading arrest with a vehicle. See Tex. Penal Code § 38.04(b)(2)(A). The district court accepted

his plea and placed him on deferred-adjudication community supervision for a period of eight

years. The State subsequently moved to adjudicate his guilt, alleging that he had violated the terms

and conditions of his community supervision. Following a hearing, the district court found all but

one of the six alleged violations to be true, revoked Turner’s community supervision, adjudged

him guilty of evading arrest with a vehicle, and sentenced him to four years’ confinement.

Turner’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a

brief concluding that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements

of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why

there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 81–82 (1988).

Turner’s counsel has also certified to the Court that he sent copies of the motion and brief to

Turner; informed him of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response; and

provided him with a motion to assist him in obtaining the record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313,

319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. To date, no pro se response

has been filed.

Turner’s community-supervision conditions required that he commit no offense

against the laws of Texas, that he abstain from using THC and other narcotics without a doctor’s

prescription, that he perform community service at a rate of “no less than 8 hours per month,” that

he complete a cognitive-based education program as directed by his supervising officer and pay

any associated costs, and that he attend weekly “recovery support group meetings” and provide

documentation of his attendance. The State’s motion to adjudicate Turner’s guilt alleged

violations of each of these conditions, including that he “was arrested and/or charged with a new

offense of Evading Arrest” and that he used THC without a doctor’s prescription on or about

September 24, 2024.

During the hearing on the motion to adjudicate, the district court heard evidence

that Turner fled from Austin Police Department Detective David Freston on September 17, 2024.

Detective Freston—whose dash- and body-cam videos were admitted into evidence—testified that

he had been on patrol in a marked squad car and a uniform when he observed Turner commit traffic

violations. Believing that Turner was possibly intoxicated, the detective followed him until he

abruptly parked, got out of his vehicle, and started walking away while looking over his shoulder.

Detective Freston activated his overhead emergency lights but exited his squad car after losing

sight of Turner. He then saw Turner running away and shouted multiple times, “Austin Police,

2 Stop” while pursuing him on foot. After Turner tripped and fell to the ground, he was arrested for

evading arrest on foot.

The court heard evidence of further violations from Alejandra Ramos, Turner’s

probation officer. Ramos testified that Turner failed a urinalysis drug test on September 24, 2024,

when he tested positive for THC, which he admitted to using on that date. According to Ramos,

Turner would skip months of community service, repeatedly failed to meet his weekly quotas, and

had a balance of 100 community-service hours remaining as of August 2024. She testified that he

likewise failed to provide her with the required completion certificate for the education program,

that he did not enroll in a recovery self-help group, and that he did not return a signed attendance

sheet for the group to her. An October 7, 2024 compliance progress report, which was signed by

Ramos and which reflected her testimony, was admitted into evidence.

Turner also testified and admitted to violating his community-supervision

conditions. He testified that he quit using drugs after the positive September 24 drug test using

skills he had learned in the education program, for which he admitted he had not paid for the

certificate. He testified that he did not understand why he had to attend self-help meetings but that

he “did some of them.” Asked why he had not completed his community-service hours, he

testified, “I ain’t going to make no excuses. I guess I could just do better. But . . . I just let it slip

a little bit.” And, regarding his arrest on September 17, he explained that he had not been “really

trying to run away” but had “started to run at some point” and had stopped when he realized he

was making a mistake. He admitted that he had made “a few mistakes.”

We have conducted an independent review of the record, including the record of

the revocation proceeding below and appellate counsel’s brief, and find no reversible error. See

Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27

3 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious

grounds for review and that the appeal is frivolous.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The district court’s judgment

adjudicating guilt is affirmed.

__________________________________________ Rosa Lopez Theofanis, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Theofanis and Crump

Affirmed

Filed: July 14, 2026

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Bledsoe v. State
178 S.W.3d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Garner v. State
300 S.W.3d 763 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2009)
Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Johnny Lee Turner, Jr. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnny-lee-turner-jr-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp3-2026.