Johnny Illova v. William H. Bannan, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan

Sixth Circuit

Johnny Illova v. William H. Bannan, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan

283 F.2d 117

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 6, 1960

Docket14221_1

StatusPublished

This text of 283 F.2d 117 (Johnny Illova v. William H. Bannan, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnny Illova v. William H. Bannan, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan, 283 F.2d 117 (6th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed for the reason that appellant has not exhausted his state remedy by application for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States from the order of the Supreme Court of Michigan denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Title 28 U.S.C. § 2254; Ex parte Hawk, 321 U.S. 114, 64 S.Ct. 448, 88 L.Ed. 572; Darr v. Burford, 339 U.S. 200, 70 S.Ct. 587, 94 L.Ed. 761.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed for the reason that appellant has not exhausted his state remedy by application for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States from the order of the Supreme Court of Michigan denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Title 28 U.S.C. § 2254; Ex parte Hawk, 321 U.S. 114, 64 S.Ct. 448, 88 L.Ed. 572; Darr v. Burford, 339 U.S. 200, 70 S.Ct. 587, 94 L.Ed. 761.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 F.2d 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnny-illova-v-william-h-bannan-warden-state-prison-of-southern-ca6-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack