Johnnie Mae Riley v. LaDonna Gale Suber Thigpen, Phyllis Ann Meadors and Harold Judson Suber

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 4, 2009
Docket06-09-00008-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Johnnie Mae Riley v. LaDonna Gale Suber Thigpen, Phyllis Ann Meadors and Harold Judson Suber (Johnnie Mae Riley v. LaDonna Gale Suber Thigpen, Phyllis Ann Meadors and Harold Judson Suber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnnie Mae Riley v. LaDonna Gale Suber Thigpen, Phyllis Ann Meadors and Harold Judson Suber, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-09-00008-CV ______________________________

JOHNNIE MAE RILEY, Appellant

V.

LADONNA GALE SUBER THIGPEN, PHYLLIS ANN MEADORS, AND HAROLD JUDSON SUBER, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 2008-941-CCL2

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPINION

Johnnie Mae Riley, appellant, filed pro se her notice of appeal January 7, 2009.

The clerk's record was filed February 26, 2009, and the reporter's record was filed April 16,

2009. Riley's brief was therefore due May 18, 2009. This Court granted Riley an extension of thirty

days, to June 17, 2009. Riley then filed a second request for an extension of time, which we also

granted, to August 17, 2009. In that correspondence granting Riley's request for an extension, we

informed her that no more requests for an extension would be granted and that failure to file her brief

by that date could result in her appeal being dismissed. See TEX . R. APP . P. 42.3(b), (c).

Riley has now filed a third request for an extension of time, asking to August 31, 2009, to

which Appellees have filed an objection. It is now September 4, and no brief has been filed. We

overrule Riley's motion for an extension of time and, pursuant to Rule 42.3(b) of the Texas Rules

of Appellate Procedure, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX . R. APP . P. 42.3(b).

BY THE COURT

Date Submitted: September 3, 2009 Date Decided: September 4, 2009

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Johnnie Mae Riley v. LaDonna Gale Suber Thigpen, Phyllis Ann Meadors and Harold Judson Suber, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnnie-mae-riley-v-ladonna-gale-suber-thigpen-phy-texapp-2009.