Johnnie Lee Miller v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida

Fifth Circuit

Johnnie Lee Miller v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida

485 F.2d 185, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7485

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 17, 1973·No. 73-2153·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Miller, a Florida state prisoner, appeals from the denial of habeas corpus after an evidentiary hearing. He attacks his state court conviction and sentence for second degree murder on two grounds: (1) illegal search and seizure of a weapon introduced at his trial; (2) denial of his constitutional right to full and adequate cross-examination. We affirm.

The evidence fully supported the district court’s finding of probable cause to arrest the defendant. The district court also correctly held that the search and seizure of the weapon which occurred at about the same time as defendant’s arrest was therefore lawful, being incidental to the arrest. See United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 70 S.Ct. 430, 94 L.Ed. 653 (1950); Lovelace v. United States, 5 Cir. 1966, 357 F.2d 306, 310; Holt v. Simpson, 7 Cir. 1965, 340 F.2d 853.

Appellant’s second ground relates to unsuccessful attempts to cross-examine prosecution witnesses concerning an alleged statement of appellant made at or near the time of his arrest. Our review of the circumstances does not convince us that the matter complained of rises to constitutional proportions even if the state trial court erroneously restricted cross-examination. See Summerville v. Cook, 5 Cir. 1971, 438 F.2d 1196.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Miller, a Florida state prisoner, appeals from the denial of habeas corpus after an evidentiary hearing. He attacks his state court conviction and sentence for second degree murder on two grounds: (1) illegal search and seizure of a weapon introduced at his trial; (2) denial of his constitutional right to full and adequate cross-examination. We affirm.

The evidence fully supported the district court’s finding of probable cause to arrest the defendant. The district court also correctly held that the search and seizure of the weapon which occurred at about the same time as defendant’s arrest was therefore lawful, being incidental to the arrest. See United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 70 S.Ct. 430, 94 L.Ed. 653 (1950); Lovelace v. United States, 5 Cir. 1966, 357 F.2d 306, 310; Holt v. Simpson, 7 Cir. 1965, 340 F.2d 853.

Appellant’s second ground relates to unsuccessful attempts to cross-examine prosecution witnesses concerning an alleged statement of appellant made at or near the time of his arrest. Our review of the circumstances does not convince us that the matter complained of rises to constitutional proportions even if the state trial court erroneously restricted cross-examination. See Summerville v. Cook, 5 Cir. 1971, 438 F.2d 1196.

Affirmed.

Johnnie Lee Miller v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, 485 F.2d 185, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7485 (5th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

485 F.2d 185 (Johnnie Lee Miller v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related