Johnnie Clarence Rogers, Jr. v. David K. Smith

43 F.3d 1468, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40090, 1994 WL 704839
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 19, 1994
Docket94-6997
StatusUnpublished

This text of 43 F.3d 1468 (Johnnie Clarence Rogers, Jr. v. David K. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnnie Clarence Rogers, Jr. v. David K. Smith, 43 F.3d 1468, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40090, 1994 WL 704839 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

43 F.3d 1468

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Johnnie Clarence ROGERS, Jr., Petitioner Appellant,
v.
David K. SMITH, Respondent Appellee.

No. 94-6997.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 17, 1994.
Decided Dec. 19, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, District Judge. (CA-94-279-AM).

Johnnie Clarence Rogers, Jr., appellant Pro Se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Rogers v. Smith, No. CA-94-279-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 F.3d 1468, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40090, 1994 WL 704839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnnie-clarence-rogers-jr-v-david-k-smith-ca4-1994.