Johnie Ray Thomas v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 13, 2012
Docket07-11-00460-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Johnie Ray Thomas v. State (Johnie Ray Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnie Ray Thomas v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

NO. 07-11-00460-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JANUARY 13, 2012

JOHNIE RAY THOMAS, APPELLANT

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 15,556-C; HONORABLE ANA ESTEVEZ, JUDGE

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Johnie Ray Thomas, filed a notice of appeal on November 16, 2011,

challenging the trial court’s adjudication of appellant as guilty of the offense of sexual

assault of a child, and sentence of 12 years incarceration in the Institutional Division of

the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. According to the record, appellant was

adjudicated and sentenced in open court on October 10, 2011. We dismiss the appeal

for want of jurisdiction.

In a criminal case in which no motion for new trial is filed, the notice of appeal

must be filed within 30 days after the date sentence is imposed in open court. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). The time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within 15

days after the deadline for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a

motion complying with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. TEX. R.

APP. P. 26.3. Under these rules, appellant's notice of appeal was due to be filed on

November 9, 2011. While appellant’s notice of appeal was filed within 15 days after the

deadline, his notice of appeal was not accompanied by a motion for extension of time.

By letter dated November 28, this Court notified appellant that his notice of appeal

appeared to have been untimely filed. Further, that letter provided appellant an

opportunity to explain to this Court how we have jurisdiction over this cause. In

response, appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal that

requested this Court accept the untimely filed notice of appeal because, “[t]here was

some confusion as to which case would be appealed.”

A notice of appeal which complies with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

is essential to vest this Court with jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208,

209-10 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, this Court does not

obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal, and can take no action other than

to dismiss the appeal. Id. at 210.

We acknowledge that appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing

a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal

Appeals; however, the availability of that remedy is also beyond the jurisdiction of this

Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3 (West Supp. 2010); Ex parte

Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240, 241 (Tex.Crim.App. 1999).

2 Consequently, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Mackey K. Hancock Justice

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Ex Parte Garcia
988 S.W.2d 240 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Johnie Ray Thomas v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnie-ray-thomas-v-state-texapp-2012.