Johnathan Robert Coffee v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 30, 2024
Docket14-23-00973-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Johnathan Robert Coffee v. the State of Texas (Johnathan Robert Coffee v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnathan Robert Coffee v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 30, 2024

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00973-CR

JOHNATHAN ROBERT COFFEE, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1682596

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge of murder. See Tex. Penal Code § 19.02. Appellant and the State agreed that appellant’s punishment would not exceed confinement in prison for more than forty-five years. In accordance with the terms of this plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for forty years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. We dismiss the appeal. Because appellant’s plea was made pursuant to a plea bargain and the punishment assessed by the trial court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor, he may appeal only matters raised by a written pre-trial motion or with the trial court’s permission. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant does not challenge any pre-trial rulings. On March 19, 2024, appellant’s appointed counsel filed a “notice that Court lacks jurisdiction because appeal was waived and State agreed to cap on punishment.” On the same day, we sent a notice that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless appellant demonstrated within 21 days that the court has jurisdiction. No response was filed.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Poissant. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 19.02
Texas PE § 19.02

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Johnathan Robert Coffee v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnathan-robert-coffee-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.