Johnathan Lee X v. Bratten

Fourth Circuit

Johnathan Lee X v. Bratten

932 F.2d 963, 1991 WL 78070

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 15, 1991

Docket90-6676

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 932 F.2d 963 (Johnathan Lee X v. Bratten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnathan Lee X v. Bratten, 932 F.2d 963, 1991 WL 78070 (4th Cir. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

932 F.2d 963

Johnathan Lee X
v.
Bratten (Irene), Bair (Toni), Taylor (John), Murray
(Edward), Larsen (C.D.), Williams (David), Smith (David),
Killeen (Joseph), Bullock (Thomas), Greene (Fred), Thompson
(Charles), Coleman (Betty), Newton (Faye), Watkins
(Christopher), Sheffield (Wayne), Stovall (Wayne), Toyster
(Joanne), Jones (O.V.), Batton (S.), Miss Hatcher, Mrs.
Dougherty, Evans (Lucille), Miss Bower, Oliver (W.J.), Shaw
(R.), Crenshaw (H.), Gulmatico (Oscar)

NO. 90-6676

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

MAY 15, 1991

Appeal From: D.Va.

AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI