Johnathan Johnson v. the State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)·Decided February 20, 2026·No. 03-26-00050-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-26-00050-CR

Johnathan Johnson, Appellant v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 8 OF TRAVIS COUNTY, NO. C-1-CR-25-210875, THE HONORABLE CARLOS HUMBERTO BARRERA, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The State charged appellant Johnathan Johnson with misdemeanor criminal trespass. See Tex. Penal Code § 30.05(a). Johnson has filed a pro se notice of appeal from the trial court’s November 13, 2025 agreed order adjudging him incompetent and ordering his treatment at a mental health facility. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 46B.005.

Johnson, who is represented by appointed counsel in the trial court, has no right to hybrid representation, see Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995), and his pro se notice of appeal presents nothing for our review, see Patrick, 906 S.W.2d at 498; Scarbrough v. State, 777 S.W.2d 83, 92 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P.

43.2(f).

Rosa Lopez Theofanis, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Theofanis and Crump Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: February 20, 2026 Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnathan Johnson v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Johnathan Johnson v. the State of Texas (Johnathan Johnson v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patrick v. State
906 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Scarbrough v. State
777 S.W.2d 83 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1989)
Robinson v. State
240 S.W.3d 919 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)