Johnathan Cooper v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 9, 2018·No. 05-18-01246-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered November 9, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01246-CR

JOHNATHAN COOPER, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 297th District Court Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1031532D

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 5, 2018 pro se motion for abatement.

Appellant asks the Court to abate his appeal so that he may be bench warranted to the trial court so that he may “physically speak” to appellate counsel regarding his appellate rights. Appellant also expresses dissatisfaction with the performance of appointed counsel.

Because appellant is represented by counsel, he is not entitled to hybrid representation.

See Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1981).

Accordingly, appellant’s motion is DENIED.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnathan Cooper v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Johnathan Cooper v. State (Johnathan Cooper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rudd v. State
616 S.W.2d 623 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)