Johnas v. Pelletier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Johnas v. Pelletier

120 A.D.2d 919, 502 N.Y.S.2d 954, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 57002

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 29, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 120 A.D.2d 919 (Johnas v. Pelletier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnas v. Pelletier, 120 A.D.2d 919, 502 N.Y.S.2d 954, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 57002 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Hughes, J.), entered May 29, 1985 in Albany County, which denied the motion of defendant Winthrop Laboratories, Inc., to modify a discovery order, and (2) from an order of said court, entered September 25, 1985 in Albany County, which denied the motion of defendant Winthrop Laboratories, Inc., for renewal.

Defendant Winthrop Laboratories, Inc., seeks to modify a discovery order by redacting certain information in documents turned over to the other parties to this action. Inasmuch as the other parties had already reviewed the documents and were aware of the material to be redacted, the relief sought is moot and Special Term properly denied the motion.

Orders affirmed, with costs to respondents filing briefs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Hughes, J.), entered May 29, 1985 in Albany County, which denied the motion of defendant Winthrop Laboratories, Inc., to modify a discovery order, and (2) from an order of said court, entered September 25, 1985 in Albany County, which denied the motion of defendant Winthrop Laboratories, Inc., for renewal.

Defendant Winthrop Laboratories, Inc., seeks to modify a discovery order by redacting certain information in documents turned over to the other parties to this action. Inasmuch as the other parties had already reviewed the documents and were aware of the material to be redacted, the relief sought is moot and Special Term properly denied the motion.

Orders affirmed, with costs to respondents filing briefs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A.D.2d 919, 502 N.Y.S.2d 954, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 57002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnas-v-pelletier-nyappdiv-1986.