John Yi v. Bong Ko, Kon Young Park and Unlimited PCS, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 29, 2015·No. 05-15-00644-CV·Published

Opinion

Dismiss and Opinion Filed September 29, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00644-CV

JOHN YI, Appellant

V.

BONG KO, Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-10821-E

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Evans, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Evans

Subject to a few mostly statutory exceptions, we have jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments and orders, that is, judgments and orders disposing of all parties and claims. Lehman v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). The judgment and order appellant appeals, a default judgment and order denying appellant’s sworn motion for new trial and to set aside the default judgment, dispose only of appellee’s claims against appellant and not appellee’s claims against two other parties. Although appellee filed a notice nonsuiting the two other parties after obtaining the default judgment, the trial court did not sign an order of nonsuit. See Farmer v. Ben E. Keith Co., 907 S.W.2d 495, 496 (Tex. 1995) (per curiam) (“When a judgment is interlocutory because unadjudicated parties or claims remain before the court, and when one

moves to have such unadjudicated claims or parties removed by severance, dismissal, or nonsuit, the appellate timetable runs from the signing of a judgment or order disposing of those claims or parties.”).

Because it appeared no final judgment existed, we directed the parties to file letter briefs addressing our jurisdiction. In his brief, appellant agrees no final judgment exists. Appellee, however, noting the trial court closed the case and cancelled the trial setting upon the filing of the notice of nonsuit, asserts all parties and claims were disposed by the combination of the default judgment, notice of nonsuit, and trial court’s closure of the case. We are unpersuaded by appellee’s arguments. See Farmer, 907 S.W.2d at 496; see also Park Place Hosp. v. Estate of Milo, 909 S.W.2d 508, 510 (Tex. 1999) (although notice of nonsuit filed, appellate timetable not triggered until trial court signed written order of dismissal). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

/David W. Evans/

DAVID EVANS

150644F.P05 JUSTICE

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

JOHN YI, Appellant On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-15-00644-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-10821-E.

Opinion delivered by Justice Evans. Justices BONG KO, Appellee Lang and Whitehill participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellee Bong Ko recover his costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant John Yi.

Judgment entered this 29th day of September, 2015.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Yi v. Bong Ko, Kon Young Park and Unlimited PCS, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

John Yi v. Bong Ko, Kon Young Park and Unlimited PCS, Inc. (John Yi v. Bong Ko, Kon Young Park and Unlimited PCS, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farmer v. Ben E. Keith Co.
907 S.W.2d 495 (Texas Supreme Court, 1995)
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
Park Place Hospital v. Estate of Milo
909 S.W.2d 508 (Texas Supreme Court, 1995)