John William Groenveld v. Reading Company
This text of 178 F.2d 405 (John William Groenveld v. Reading Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
178 F.2d 405
John William GROENVELD
v.
READING COMPANY, Appellant.
No. 9993.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued December 9, 1949.
Decided December 28, 1949.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; George A. Welsh, Judge.
Henry R. Heebner, Philadelphia, Pa. (Wm. Clarke Mason, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
Gordon H. Mahley, Syracuse, N. Y. (Harry A. Demar, Philadelphia, Pa., J. Murray Dunn, Syracuse, N. Y., on the brief), for appellee.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and O'CONNELL1 and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We have considered carefully the points raised by the appellant. We can perceive no substantial error in the decision of the court below. Accordingly the judgment will be affirmed.
Notes:
Judge O'Connell heard the argument and participated in the decision in this case but died before the opinion was filed
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 F.2d 405, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-william-groenveld-v-reading-company-ca3-1949.