John W. Smith v. Highlines Construction Co., Inc., and the Gray Insurance Company

228 So. 3d 1205, 2017 WL 4231208
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 22, 2017·No. 2016-C-1443·Published

Opinions

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND CIRCUIT, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION DISTRICT IE

PER CURIAM

hln light of our opinion in Burgess v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, 16-2267 (La. 6/29/17), 225 So.3d 1020, 2017 WL 2836062, the judgment of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside insofar as it finds claimant was not entitled to reim[1206] bursement. The case is remanded to the Office of Workers’ Compensation for a determination, consistent with the interpretation of La. R.S. 23:1203(A) set forth in Burgess, of whether the out-of-state pharmacy’s services were not available in Louisiana or whether the out-of-state pharmacy can provide services for comparable costs to those of a Louisiana pharmacy. In all other respects, the judgment of the court of appeal is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John W. Smith v. Highlines Construction Co., Inc., and the Gray Insurance Company, 228 So. 3d 1205, 2017 WL 4231208 (La. 2017).

228 So. 3d 1205 (John W. Smith v. Highlines Construction Co., Inc., and the Gray Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Darvel Burgess v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
225 So. 3d 1020 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2017)