John W. Sherman v. Raymond W. Meier, Warden
462 F.2d 609, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8865
Opinion
We affirm the district court’s order dismissing appellant’s habeas corpus petition on the ground that the petition did not state a claim for relief.
It is within the correctional institution’s discretion to regulate the hair styles of the inmates in the manner alleged here. (Cf. Smith v. Schneckloth (9th Cir. 1969) 414 F.2d 680.)
The order is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
John W. Sherman v. Raymond W. Meier, Warden, 462 F.2d 609, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8865 (9th Cir. 1972).
462 F.2d 609 (John W. Sherman v. Raymond W. Meier, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Donald Raymond Smith v. Merle R. Schneckloth, Superintendent, California Conservation Center
414 F.2d 680 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)