John W. Rogers and Creta B. Rogers v. United States
This text of 290 F.2d 501 (John W. Rogers and Creta B. Rogers v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in that its findings on the facts are not clearly erroneous.
The taxpayers probably have been maneuvered by their purchaser into a big tax disadvantage. But, when in their second option, they agreed in writing after negotiation to the assignment of some |60,900 as consideration for a covenant not to compete, the trial court could refuse to go behind the agreement and uphold the commissioner in treating the sum as ordinary income. We find Hamlin’s Trust v. Commissioner, 10 Cir., 209 F.2d 761, pertinent and a case that should be followed here.
Had there been any equivocation or any confusion as to what was done, then taxpayers would have had a far different case. Third parties may question the resolutions of parties to a contract, but in the absence of fraud it is not ordinarily open to the bargainers to do so. Cf. Gray v. Powell, 314 U.S. 402, 414, 62 S.Ct. 326, 86 L.Ed. 301.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
290 F.2d 501, 7 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1318, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-w-rogers-and-creta-b-rogers-v-united-states-ca9-1961.