John W. King v. F. Keller (No. 2)

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

John W. King v. F. Keller (No. 2)

90 Pa. Super. 608, 1927 Pa. Super. LEXIS 130

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 9, 1927

Docket2; Appeal 38

StatusPublished

This text of 90 Pa. Super. 608 (John W. King v. F. Keller (No. 2)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

John W. King v. F. Keller (No. 2), 90 Pa. Super. 608, 1927 Pa. Super. LEXIS 130 (Pa. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

This was a joint action by John W. King and Cora P. King, his wife, to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by each of them through the alleged negligence of the appellant. A verdict was returned awarding damages in the sum of $2,473 to the wife and $1,371.50 to the husband, and this appeal is from the judgment entered upon the verdict in favor of the husband.

In an opinion filed this day at No. 37 February Term, 1927, we have set forth at length our reasons for affirming the judgment in favor of Cora P. King. It follows from the conclusions there reached that the judgment on the verdict in favor of her husband, John W. King, should also be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

This was a joint action by John W. King and Cora P. King, his wife, to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by each of them through the alleged negligence of the appellant. A verdict was returned awarding damages in the sum of $2,473 to the wife and $1,371.50 to the husband, and this appeal is from the judgment entered upon the verdict in favor of the husband.

In an opinion filed this day at No. 37 February Term, 1927, we have set forth at length our reasons for affirming the judgment in favor of Cora P. King. It follows from the conclusions there reached that the judgment on the verdict in favor of her husband, John W. King, should also be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 Pa. Super. 608, 1927 Pa. Super. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-w-king-v-f-keller-no-2-pasuperct-1927.