John W. Harper v. Robert D. Richardson and Barbara S. Richardson

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 25, 2016·No. 16-2554·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

JOHN W. HARPER, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D16-2554

ROBERT D. RICHARDSON AND BARBARA S. RICHARDSON,

Appellees.

_____________________________/ Opinion filed September 13, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Clay County. Michael S. Sharrit, Judge.

Preston H. Oughton and Christopher D. Keever, Jacksonville, for Appellant. John D. Middleton, Melrose, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. Jensen v. Whetstine, 985 So. 2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (“An order is not an appealable partial final order where there is a factual overlap between the pending claims and the claims resolved by the order.”). WOLF, LEWIS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John W. Harper v. Robert D. Richardson and Barbara S. Richardson, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

John W. Harper v. Robert D. Richardson and Barbara S. Richardson (John W. Harper v. Robert D. Richardson and Barbara S. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jensen v. Whetstine
985 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)