John W. Gaither v. Hunter Marine Transport, Inc.
This text of 990 F.2d 442 (John W. Gaither v. Hunter Marine Transport, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John W. Gaither was injured while working as a deckhand on the M/Y Sarah G. Hunter on the Cumberland River. He filed suit under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, alleging that Hunter Marine Transport, Inc. (Hunter) negligently failed to provide a safe place to work and that Hunter failed to provide a “seaworthy” vessel. Gaither sought compensatory and punitive damages. Hunter raised the affirmative defense of contributory negligence. The jury, by special interrogatory, returned a verdict in favor of Hunter, and the district court 1 entered judgment accordingly. Gaither appeals. Hunter moves to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Because we hold Gaither’s appeal was timely filed, we deny Hunter’s motion to dismiss. After thoroughly reviewing the record and Gaither’s arguments, we conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict, and that the district court properly applied the law. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir.R. 47B.
. The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the Eastern and Western Districts of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
990 F.2d 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-w-gaither-v-hunter-marine-transport-inc-ca8-1993.