John W. Cowper Co. v. Buffalo Hotel Development Venture

91 A.D.2d 1183, 459 N.Y.S.2d 175, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16539
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 31, 1983
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 91 A.D.2d 1183 (John W. Cowper Co. v. Buffalo Hotel Development Venture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John W. Cowper Co. v. Buffalo Hotel Development Venture, 91 A.D.2d 1183, 459 N.Y.S.2d 175, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16539 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

— Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: Plaintiff Cowper instituted this action for breach of contract and foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien to recover sums due under a contract with Buffalo Hotel Development Venture and its sole general partner, Clement Chen, Jr., for construction of the Buffalo Hilton Hotel and parking garage. In its eighth cause of action, plaintiff alleges that defendants intentionally withheld payment in order to invest such funds at high interest rates, as a result of which plaintiff was forced to borrow at prime rates in order to meet its cash flow demands. Plaintiff’s eighth cause of action, seeking an equitable remedy to recover the sums expended, must be dismissed. The parties provided in their contract that, in the event that defendants failed to make timely payments, [1184]*1184any payments due would bear interest “at the legal rate prevailing at the place of the Project.” Plaintiff claims, however, that recovery at the prevailing rate will not compensate for the cost it incurred when it was forced to borrow in an expensive money market, whereas defendants’ high-yield investments brought returns worth considerably more than interest under the contract. Plaintiff’s remedy lies with the Legislature, not with the courts (see Two Clinton Sq. Corp. v Computerized Recovery Systems, 84 AD2d 911). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, J. B. Kane, J. — dismiss cause of action.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Denman and Boomer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John W. Cowper Co. v. Buffalo Hotel Development Venture
99 A.D.2d 19 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 A.D.2d 1183, 459 N.Y.S.2d 175, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-w-cowper-co-v-buffalo-hotel-development-venture-nyappdiv-1983.