John v. Hunt
This text of 1 Blackf. 324 (John v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Drew, in his life-time, mortgaged certain lands to JV. and A. Hunt, for securing the payment of a certain sum of money. After the decease of Drew, the money remaining un* [325]*325paid, the Hunts sued out a scire facias against John, administrator of Drezo, to foreclose the mortgage; on which the plaintiffs obtained a judgment by default. The only question arising out of the case is, whether the heirs of Drew should not have been made parties in the scire facias. It is not to be presumed that a man dies without heirs. If such is the fact it must be shown. The equity of redemption belongs of right to the heir of the mortgagor; and he should be a party in any proceedings to foreclose the mortgage. Such is the British practice; and we see nothing in our acts of assembly which requires this practice to be changed.
The judgment is reversed with costs. To be certified, &c.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Blackf. 324, 1824 Ind. LEXIS 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-v-hunt-ind-1824.