John v. Cassidy

2017 NY Slip Op 6863
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 29, 2017
DocketMot. 482/17 CA 16-01843
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 6863 (John v. Cassidy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John v. Cassidy, 2017 NY Slip Op 6863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

John v Cassidy (2017 NY Slip Op 06863)
John v Cassidy
2017 NY Slip Op 06863
Decided on September 29, 2017
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on September 29, 2017
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ. (Filed Sept. 29, 2017.)
MOTION NO. (482/17) CA 16-01843.

[*1]MARDI JOHN, BY THE PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, CHERYL KENDALL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

DANIEL CASSIDY, DEFENDANT, AND PAUL KLEINDIENST, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. DANIEL CASSIDY AND PAUL KLEINDIENST, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS, DANIEL A. MESSINA AND DIKK SCHRADER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 6863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-v-cassidy-nyappdiv-2017.