John V. Boland Construction Co.

Court of Claims

John V. Boland Construction Co.

156 Ct. Cl. 695, 1962 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 219, 1962 WL 1552

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedJanuary 19, 1962

DocketNo. 200-59

StatusPublished

This text of 156 Ct. Cl. 695 (John V. Boland Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

John V. Boland Construction Co., 156 Ct. Cl. 695, 1962 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 219, 1962 WL 1552 (cc 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Contract; disputes; administrative remedies; failure to exhaust; limitation of actions. — Plaintiff filed its petition on [696]*696May 4, 1959, to recover damages allegedly sustained in performing a contract to construct a weather station for the Corps of Engineers on the ground that the contracting officer had acted arbitrarily (1) in denying requested extensions of time for delay caused 'by severe weather, and (2) in allowing troops to occupy the facility while the work was still being performed by plaintiff. Plaintiff did not appeal to the Secretary of the Army within 30 days of the adverse decision of the Corps of Engineers Claims and Appeals Board as provided in the disputes article of its contract, and its petition was filed seven and one-half years after defendant had accepted the contract work as complete.

The case came before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiff’s response thereto. Upon consideration thereof, together with oral argument of counsel, the court concluded that plaintiff had failed to exhaust its administrative remedy by failing to file a timely appeal from the Claims and Appeals Board and also that the claim was barred by the six-year statute of limitations (28 U.S.C. § 2501 (1958)) in that the petition was filed more than six years after the claim first accrued. On January 19,1962, the court ordered that the petition be dismissed. Plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court, 370U.S.911.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Contract; disputes; administrative remedies; failure to exhaust; limitation of actions. — Plaintiff filed its petition on [696]*696May 4, 1959, to recover damages allegedly sustained in performing a contract to construct a weather station for the Corps of Engineers on the ground that the contracting officer had acted arbitrarily (1) in denying requested extensions of time for delay caused 'by severe weather, and (2) in allowing troops to occupy the facility while the work was still being performed by plaintiff. Plaintiff did not appeal to the Secretary of the Army within 30 days of the adverse decision of the Corps of Engineers Claims and Appeals Board as provided in the disputes article of its contract, and its petition was filed seven and one-half years after defendant had accepted the contract work as complete.

The case came before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiff’s response thereto. Upon consideration thereof, together with oral argument of counsel, the court concluded that plaintiff had failed to exhaust its administrative remedy by failing to file a timely appeal from the Claims and Appeals Board and also that the claim was barred by the six-year statute of limitations (28 U.S.C. § 2501 (1958)) in that the petition was filed more than six years after the claim first accrued. On January 19,1962, the court ordered that the petition be dismissed. Plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court, 370U.S.911.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 Ct. Cl. 695, 1962 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 219, 1962 WL 1552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-v-boland-construction-co-cc-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack