John Thompson v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 16, 2024
DocketA25A0288
StatusPublished

This text of John Thompson v. State (John Thompson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John Thompson v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ September 16, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A0288. JOHN THOMPSON v. THE STATE.

John Thompson was convicted of aggravated sodomy and related offenses in 1991. His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal in Thompson v. State, 203 Ga. App. 339, 341 (416 SE2d 755) (1992). In 2024, Thompson filed an extraordinary motion for new trial, which the trial court denied on June 24, 2024. Thompson filed a notice of appeal on August 21, 2024. We lack jurisdiction for two reasons. First, Thompson’s appeal is untimely. A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment or trial court order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Ebeling v. State, 355 Ga. App. 469, 469 (844 SE2d 518) (2020). Thompson’s notice of appeal was filed 58 days after entry of the trial court’s order and is thus untimely. Second, an appeal from an order denying an extraordinary motion for new trial must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (7), (b); Balkcom v. State, 227 Ga. App. 327, 329 (489 SE2d 129) (1997). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Thompson’s failure to follow the discretionary review procedure thus deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal. See Bradberry v. State, 315 Ga. App. 434, 437 (727 SE2d 208) (2012). For these reasons, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 09/16/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. State
416 S.E.2d 755 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Balkcom v. State
489 S.E.2d 129 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Bradberry v. State
727 S.E.2d 208 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)
Smoak v. Department of Human Resources
471 S.E.2d 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
John Thompson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-thompson-v-state-gactapp-2024.