John T. Roberts, and Louise S. Roberts v. United States

846 F.2d 73, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 6071, 1988 WL 46287
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 9, 1988
Docket87-3755
StatusUnpublished

This text of 846 F.2d 73 (John T. Roberts, and Louise S. Roberts v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John T. Roberts, and Louise S. Roberts v. United States, 846 F.2d 73, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 6071, 1988 WL 46287 (4th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

846 F.2d 73
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
John T. ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
Louise S. ROBERTS, Plaintiff
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee

No. 87-3755.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 30, 1988.
Decided May 9, 1988.

John T. Roberts and Louise S. Roberts, appellants pro se.

William Shepard Rose, Jr., Jonathan Samuel Cohen, Michael Lee Paup, U.S. Department of Justice, for appellee.

Before K.K. HALL and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

John T. Roberts* appeals from the district court's summary judgment in his suit claiming overpayment of income taxes. In his suit, Roberts asserts that an "inflation gain" realized on his sale of securities in 1984 does not represent "taxable income."

A review of the record, the district court's opinion, and the briefs submitted by the parties to this appeal reveals that the district court's determination that the Robertses were not entitled to an income tax refund was proper. Hellermann v. Commissioner, 77 T.C. 1361 (Tax Ct. 1981); Birkenstock v. Commissioner, 646 F.2d 1185 (7th Cir.1981); Bates v. United States, 108 F.2d 407 (7th Cir.1939), cert. denied, 309 U.S. 666 (1940).

Because the facts and legal contentions are adequately developed in the materials before the court and oral argument would not aid in the decisional process, we dispense with argument in this case.

AFFIRMED.

*

Louise S. Roberts is not a party to this appeal because she, proceeding pro se, failed to sign the notice of appeal. Fed.R.App.P. 3(c); Covington v. Allsbrook, 636 F.2d 63 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 914 (1981)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
846 F.2d 73, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 6071, 1988 WL 46287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-t-roberts-and-louise-s-roberts-v-united-states-ca4-1988.