John T. Mather Memorial Hospital of Port Jefferson, Inc. v. Curry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

John T. Mather Memorial Hospital of Port Jefferson, Inc. v. Curry

63 A.D.3d 885, 880 N.Y.S.2d 542

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 63 A.D.3d 885 (John T. Mather Memorial Hospital of Port Jefferson, Inc. v. Curry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

John T. Mather Memorial Hospital of Port Jefferson, Inc. v. Curry, 63 A.D.3d 885, 880 N.Y.S.2d 542 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover payment for medical services rendered to the defendant, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Weber, J.), entered November 5, 2008, as denied that branch of his cross motion which was to dismiss the complaint as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not err in denying that branch of his cross motion which was to dismiss the complaint as time-barred (see Tebo v Robinson, 100 NY 27, 29 [1885]; Rutigliano v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 176 AD2d 866 [1991]; Amsterdam Wrecking & Salvage Co. v Greater Amsterdam School Dist., 83 AD2d 654 [1981], affd 56 NY2d 828 [1982]; Lorenzo v Bussin, 7 AD2d 731 [1958], affd 7 NY2d 1039 [1960]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Mastro, J.E, Florio, Eng and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover payment for medical services rendered to the defendant, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Weber, J.), entered November 5, 2008, as denied that branch of his cross motion which was to dismiss the complaint as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not err in denying that branch of his cross motion which was to dismiss the complaint as time-barred (see Tebo v Robinson, 100 NY 27, 29 [1885]; Rutigliano v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 176 AD2d 866 [1991]; Amsterdam Wrecking & Salvage Co. v Greater Amsterdam School Dist., 83 AD2d 654 [1981], affd 56 NY2d 828 [1982]; Lorenzo v Bussin, 7 AD2d 731 [1958], affd 7 NY2d 1039 [1960]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Mastro, J.E, Florio, Eng and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 A.D.3d 885, 880 N.Y.S.2d 542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-t-mather-memorial-hospital-of-port-jefferson-inc-v-curry-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack