John Sutter v. Oxford Health Plans

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in John Sutter v. Oxford Health Plans. Read the opinion of the Court — 675 F.3d 215
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 4, 2012·No. 11-1773·Published

Opinion

PRECEDENTIAL

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 11-1773

JOHN IVAN SUTTER, M.D.

v.

OXFORD HEALTH PLANS LLC,

Appellant

On Appeal from the District Court for the District of New Jersey (No. 05-cv-2198)

District Judge: Honorable Garrett E. Brown

Before: FUENTES, CHAGARES, Circuit Judges, and POGUE, Judge1

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

It appearing that first paragraph, first line of the opinion filed April 3, 2012 omitted the first name of the appellee, at the direction of the Court it is hereby O R D E R E D that the opinion is amended as follows:

Oxford Health Plans, LLC, and Dr. John Ivan Sutter are parties to a Primary Care Physician Agreement, drafted by Oxford, which contains a broad arbitration clause.

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk Date: April 4, 2012 MB/cc: Eric D. Katz, Esq.

P. Christine Deruelle, Esq.

1 Hon. Donald C. Pogue, Chief Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

Adam N. Saravay, Esq. Edward Soto, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Sutter v. Oxford Health Plans, (3d Cir. 2012).

John Sutter v. Oxford Health Plans (John Sutter v. Oxford Health Plans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.