John Sturgeon v. Bert Frost
This text of 941 F.3d 953 (John Sturgeon v. Bert Frost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHN STURGEON, No. 13-36165 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:11-cv-00183- HRH HERBERT FROST, in his official capacity as Alaska Regional Director of the National Park Service; GREG ORDER DUDGEON; ANDEE SEARS; DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of the Interior; DAVID VELA, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the National Park Service; THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE; THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Defendants-Appellees.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed November 1, 2019
Before: Jerome Farris, Dorothy W. Nelson, and Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges. 2 STURGEON V. FROST
ORDER
Appellant John Sturgeon’s request for action is GRANTED. In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Sturgeon v. Frost, 139 S. Ct. 1066 (2019), the opinion of this Court dated October 2, 2017, 872 F.3d 927, is VACATED and judgment is entered REVERSING the district court’s judgment. We remand this case to the district court with directions to enter judgment in favor of Sturgeon consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
941 F.3d 953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-sturgeon-v-bert-frost-ca9-2019.