John Solak v. Twitter, Inc.

CourtCourt of Chancery of Delaware
DecidedOctober 12, 2022
Docket2022-0491
StatusPublished

This text of John Solak v. Twitter, Inc. (John Solak v. Twitter, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John Solak v. Twitter, Inc., (Del. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KATHALEEN ST. JUDE MCCORMICK LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER CHANCELLOR 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734

October 12, 2022

Blake A. Bennett, Esquire Raymond J. DiCamillo, Esquire Cooch and Taylor, P.A. Kevin M. Gallagher, Esquire The Nemours Building Matthew D. Perri, Esquire 1007 N. Orange St., Suite 1120 Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. Wilmington, DE 19801 920 North King Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801

Re: Solak v. Twitter, Inc. C.A. No. 2022-0491-KSJM

Dear Counsel:

Plaintiff John Solak (“Plaintiff”) filed the above-referenced action to compel

Defendant Twitter, Inc. (“Defendant”) to provide its books and records for inspection under

to 8 Del. C. § 220. Plaintiff filed his Complaint and Motion to Expedite on June 7, 2022.1

Plaintiff and Defendant then entered into a series of stipulations extending Defendant’s

time to respond to the Complaint.2 The most recent of these stipulations, which I granted

on August 11, provides that Defendant “shall not be required to respond to the Complaint

until a date to be mutually agreed upon by the parties or ordered by the Court.”3

The parties failed to agree to a date to respond to the Complaint or a schedule for

litigating this action. In a status letter submitted to the court on September 28, 2022,

1 C.A. No. 2022-0491-KSJM, Docket (“Dkt.”) 1. 2 Dkt. 7, 9, 11. 3 Dkt. 11. C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM October 12, 2022 Page 2 of 2

however, Plaintiff states that Defendant has failed to respond to Plaintiff’s scheduling

proposals.4 Plaintiff requests that I issue an order requiring Defendant to respond to the

Complaint and Motion to Expedite.5

Plaintiff’s request is granted. Defendant is hereby ordered to respond to Plaintiff’s

Complaint and Motion to Expedite no later than 5 p.m., October 26, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sincerely,

/s/ Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick

Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick Chancellor

cc: All counsel of record (by File & ServeXpress)

4 Dkt. 12. 5 Id.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 220
Delaware § 220

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
John Solak v. Twitter, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-solak-v-twitter-inc-delch-2022.