John Smith v. United States
This text of 56 F.3d 69 (John Smith v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
56 F.3d 69
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
John SMITH, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 94-2442
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 1995
Filed: May 25, 1995
Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
John Smith, a federal inmate who has been given federal witness security protection, brought a "Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus" against the United States. He claimed that his confinement in a special management unit at the Federal Correctional Institution in Sandstone, Minnesota, violated his constitutional rights. The district court1 dismissed the action, and he appeals.
After careful review of the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the district court properly denied relief. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Smith's motion to change the case title to reflect his true name, and also deny his motion for leave to amend the record.
The Honorable Diana E. Murphy, then Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, now United States Circuit Judge, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F.3d 69, 1995 WL 315042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-smith-v-united-states-ca8-1995.