John S. Young v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 29, 2019
Docket03-18-00080-CR
StatusPublished

This text of John S. Young v. State (John S. Young v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John S. Young v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-18-00080-CR

John S. Young, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 119TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. B-17-0081-SB, HONORABLE MARTIN “BROCK” JONES, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

John S. Young was charged with two counts of forgery, one count of theft, and one

count of money laundering. See Tex. Penal Code §§ 31.03, 32.21, 34.02. During trial, Young

pleaded not guilty to all four charges. At the end of the trial, the jury found Young guilty of all four

charges. Following his convictions, the district court issued a certification of Young’s right of

appeal with checks and other marks next to the boxes certifying the following: this case “is not a

plea-bargain case, and the defendant has the right to appeal”; this case “is a plea-bargain case, and

the defendant has NO right to appeal”; and “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.”

Based on the record before this Court, it appears that the district court’s certification

signed May 9, 2018, may be incorrect. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614 (Tex. Crim. App.

2005) (explaining that when determining whether appellant has right to appeal, appellate courts examine trial court’s certification for defectiveness, defined as certification that is “correct in form

but which, when compared to the record before the court, proves to be inaccurate”). Therefore, we

abate the appeal and remand the case to the district court to issue a new certification. See Tex. R.

App. P. 37.1 (requiring appellate court to notify parties if there appears to be defect in certification);

Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 614 (stating that appellate courts have authority under Rules of Appellate

Procedure “to obtain another certification, whenever appropriate”).

The district court clerk is instructed to forward to this Court a supplemental clerk’s

record containing the new certification no later than April 29, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)

(stating that if appellate court “orders the trial court to prepare . . . certification of the defendant’s

right of appeal as required by these rules, the trial court clerk must prepare, certify, and file in the

appellate court a supplemental clerk’s record”).

It is ordered on March 29, 2019.

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Abated and Remanded

Filed: March 29, 2019

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
John S. Young v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-s-young-v-state-texapp-2019.