John S. Oates v. Lurline Johnson
This text of 96 S.W.2d 1119 (John S. Oates v. Lurline Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question presented by this appeal is the sufficiency of a voluntary conveyance executed by the husband to the wife, in fraud of the creditors of the husband, to support title in the wife to the land conveyed under the three-year statute of limitations. If .this question be answered in the affirmative, the judgment in this case should be affirmed. Under the authorities in this state we think it should be so answered. B. C. Evans Co. v. Guipel (Tex. Civ.App.) 35 S.W. 940; J. R. Watkins Co. v. Gibbs (Tex.Civ.App.) 66 S.W.(2d) 355, and cases there cited.
Under the authorities referred to the judgment in this case should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 S.W.2d 1119, 1936 Tex. App. LEXIS 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-s-oates-v-lurline-johnson-texapp-1936.