John S. Oates v. Lurline Johnson

96 S.W.2d 1119, 1936 Tex. App. LEXIS 858
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 18, 1936·No. No. 3386.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

WALTHALL, Justice.

The question presented by this appeal is the sufficiency of a voluntary conveyance executed by the husband to the wife, in fraud of the creditors of the husband, to support title in the wife to the land conveyed under the three-year statute of limitations. If .this question be answered in the affirmative, the judgment in this case should be affirmed. Under the authorities in this state we think it should be so answered. B. C. Evans Co. v. Guipel (Tex. Civ.App.) 35 S.W. 940; J. R. Watkins Co. v. Gibbs (Tex.Civ.App.) 66 S.W.(2d) 355, and cases there cited.

Under the authorities referred to the judgment in this case should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John S. Oates v. Lurline Johnson, 96 S.W.2d 1119, 1936 Tex. App. LEXIS 858 (Tex. Ct. App. 1936).

96 S.W.2d 1119 (John S. Oates v. Lurline Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Texas Life Ins. Co. v. Goldberg
184 S.W.2d 333 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1944)
Texas Life Insurance Co. v. Goldberg
167 S.W.2d 270 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1942)