John Roe NR 52 v. Doe 1

District Court, C.D. California·Decided February 24, 2025·No. 5:24-cv-02560·Unknown

Opinion

Lauren A. Welling (SBN: 291813) lwelling@sssfirm.com Sarah Kissel Meier (SBN: 305315) skmeier@sssfirm.com 8383 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 255 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Telephone: (310) 341-2086 Facsimile: (310) 773-5573

Attorneys for Plaintiff John Roe NR 52

Rick Richmond (SBN 194962) rrichmond@larsonllp.com Andrew E. Calderón (SBN 316673) acalderon@larsonllp.com Jina Yoon (SBN 331948) jyoon@larsonllp.com 555 South Flower Street, 30th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone:(213) 436-4888 Facsimile: (213) 623-2000

Attorneys for Defendants Doe 1, a Utah corporation sole, and Doe 2, a Utah nonprofit corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOHN ROE NR 52, Case No. 5:24−cv−02560 JGB-SP Plaintiff, Judge: Hon. Jesus G. Bernal vs. DISCOVERY MATTER: Magistrate Judge: Sheri Pym DOE 1, a corporation; DOE 2, a corporation; DOE 3, an entity of STIPULATED PROTECTIVE unknown form; and DOES 4 to 100, ORDER Inclusive,

Defendants.

1. GENERAL 1.1 Purposes and Limitations. Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 1.2 Good Cause Statement. This Action arises from allegations of childhood sexual abuse and is likely to involve medical records, psychiatric records, confidential church membership records, and other private information implicating the privacy rights of third parties for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Action: John Roe NR 52 v. Doe 1, et al, No. 5:24−cv−02560 JGB-SP (C.D. Cal. 2024). 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action, and, for purposes of Defendants, attorneys from Kirton McConkie and their staff. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm that has appeared on behalf of that party, including support staff. 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this Action. 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 4. DURATION Once a case proceeds to trial, all of the court filed information to be introduced at trial, that was previously designated as confidential or maintained pursuant to this protective order becomes public and will be presumptively available to all members of the public, including the press, unless compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings to proceed otherwise are made to the trial judge in advance of trial. See Kamakana v. City of and Cty. Of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180-81 (9th Cir. 2006) (distinguishing “good cause” showing for sealing documents produced in discovery from “compelling” reasons standard when merits related documents are part of court record). Court filed information that remains confidential and is not made available to the public at trial, shall remain subject to the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs, even after final disposition of this litigation. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this Action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this Action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 5. DES

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Roe NR 52 v. Doe 1, (C.D. Cal. 2025).

John Roe NR 52 v. Doe 1 (John Roe NR 52 v. Doe 1) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.