John Rady v. Bridge Investments, L.P.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 1, 2013
NO. 03-12-00401-CV
John Rady, Appellant
v.
Bridge Investments, L.P., Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN
IT APPEARING to this Court that the appellant has failed to file a brief, and, accordingly, has
failed to prosecute the appeal: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the
appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the
appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that
this decision be certified below for observance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
John Rady v. Bridge Investments, L.P. (John Rady v. Bridge Investments, L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.