John Rady v. Bridge Investments, L.P.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 1, 2013·No. 03-12-00401-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 1, 2013

NO. 03-12-00401-CV

John Rady, Appellant

v.

Bridge Investments, L.P., Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

IT APPEARING to this Court that the appellant has failed to file a brief, and, accordingly, has

failed to prosecute the appeal: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the

appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that

this decision be certified below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John Rady v. Bridge Investments, L.P., (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

John Rady v. Bridge Investments, L.P. (John Rady v. Bridge Investments, L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.