John R. Vandever v. C. H. Looney, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary

Tenth Circuit

John R. Vandever v. C. H. Looney, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary

220 F.2d 438

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 5, 1955

Docket5025_1

StatusPublished

This text of 220 F.2d 438 (John R. Vandever v. C. H. Looney, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

John R. Vandever v. C. H. Looney, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary, 220 F.2d 438 (10th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

220 F.2d 438

John R. VANDEVER
v.
C. H. LOONEY, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary.

No. 5025.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 5, 1955.

Robert N. Trunk, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

William C. Farmer, U.S. Atty., Wichita, Kan., and Selby S. Soward, Asst. U.S. Atty., Topeka, Kan., for appellee.

Before BRATTON and PICKETT, Circuit Judges, and VAUGHT, District judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

220 F.2d 438

John R. VANDEVER
v.
C. H. LOONEY, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary.

No. 5025.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 5, 1955.

Robert N. Trunk, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

William C. Farmer, U.S. Atty., Wichita, Kan., and Selby S. Soward, Asst. U.S. Atty., Topeka, Kan., for appellee.

Before BRATTON and PICKETT, Circuit Judges, and VAUGHT, District judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without written opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 F.2d 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-r-vandever-v-c-h-looney-warden-us-penitentiar-ca10-1955.