John R. Gonda v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services Department of Health and Human Services

23 F.3d 400, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18465, 1994 WL 175568
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 10, 1994
Docket94-1037
StatusPublished

This text of 23 F.3d 400 (John R. Gonda v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services Department of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John R. Gonda v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services Department of Health and Human Services, 23 F.3d 400, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18465, 1994 WL 175568 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

23 F.3d 400
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

John R. GONDA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services;
Department of Health and Human Services,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-1037.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 21, 1994.
Decided May 10, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (CA-91-2085-HAR)

John R. Gonda, pro se.

Juliet Ann Eurich, Richard Douglas Bennett, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his second motion for relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. United States v. Williams, 674 F.2d 310, 312 (4th Cir.1982) (relief not authorized under Rule 60(b) for mere reconsideration of legal issues). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gonda v. Shalala, No. CA-91-2085-HAR (D. Md. Nov. 1, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Michael D. Williams
674 F.2d 310 (Fourth Circuit, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 F.3d 400, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18465, 1994 WL 175568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-r-gonda-v-donna-e-shalala-secretary-of-health-ca4-1994.