John R. Byrne, Jr. v. Robert H. Sauer and Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, a Corporation

344 F.2d 330, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5764
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 28, 1965·No. 14903_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find that the court’s charge, taking it in context, contains no substantial error. The trial transcript justifies the reference by defense counsel in his summation to plaintiff’s chiropractic treatments. There is evidence in the record to support the verdict in favor of the defendant-appellee. «

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

John R. Byrne, Jr. v. Robert H. Sauer and Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, a Corporation, 344 F.2d 330, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5764 (3d Cir. 1965).

344 F.2d 330 (John R. Byrne, Jr. v. Robert H. Sauer and Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, a Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.