Home/Third Circuit/John R. Byrne, Jr. v. Robert H. Sauer and Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, a Corporation

John R. Byrne, Jr. v. Robert H. Sauer and Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, a Corporation

344 F.2d 330, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5764
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedApril 28, 1965
Docket14903_1
StatusPublished

This text of 344 F.2d 330 (John R. Byrne, Jr. v. Robert H. Sauer and Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, a Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John R. Byrne, Jr. v. Robert H. Sauer and Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, a Corporation, 344 F.2d 330, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5764 (3d Cir. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find that the court’s charge, taking it in context, contains no substantial error. The trial transcript justifies the reference by defense counsel in his summation to plaintiff’s chiropractic treatments. There is evidence in the record to support the verdict in favor of the defendant-appellee. «

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
344 F.2d 330, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-r-byrne-jr-v-robert-h-sauer-and-firestone-tire-and-rubber-ca3-1965.