John Philbin v. John Driver and Uber Technologies, Inc.
This text of John Philbin v. John Driver and Uber Technologies, Inc. (John Philbin v. John Driver and Uber Technologies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
JOHN PHILBIN, as next friend to minor, K.P., and KAROLINA CSIKOS, as personal representative of the estate of minor, B.S., Appellants,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and JOHN DRIVER, Appellees.
No. 4D2023-0727
[July 11, 2024]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; James Nutt, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502021CA012968AO.
Peter Ticktin and Michael Vater of The Ticktin Law Group, Deerfield Beach, for appellants.
Abbi Freifeld Carr and Veresa Jones Adams of Roig Lawyers, Deerfield Beach, for appellee Uber Technologies, Inc.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
WARNER, GERBER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
John Philbin v. John Driver and Uber Technologies, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-philbin-v-john-driver-and-uber-technologies-inc-fladistctapp-2024.