John Petro v. Stanley Bakely, Jr.

Third Circuit

John Petro v. Stanley Bakely, Jr.

353 F.2d 511, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3734

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedDecember 7, 1965

Docket15326_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 353 F.2d 511 (John Petro v. Stanley Bakely, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

John Petro v. Stanley Bakely, Jr., 353 F.2d 511, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3734 (3d Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal has been taken from an order of the district court denying a defendant’s motion to dismiss as res judicata an action for negligent injury. No further dispositive action has occurred in the trial court.

While the granting of a motion to dismiss may be a final judgment, the denial of such a motion lacks the finality which is essential .to support an immediate appeal.

The appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This appeal has been taken from an order of the district court denying a defendant’s motion to dismiss as res judicata an action for negligent injury. No further dispositive action has occurred in the trial court.

While the granting of a motion to dismiss may be a final judgment, the denial of such a motion lacks the finality which is essential .to support an immediate appeal.

The appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

353 F.2d 511, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-petro-v-stanley-bakely-jr-ca3-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack