John Paul Turner v. David S. Kuykendall, and Virginia Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

John Paul Turner v. David S. Kuykendall, and Virginia Department of Corrections

74 F.3d 1234, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39065, 1996 WL 16818

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 18, 1996·No. 95-7563·Published

Opinion

74 F.3d 1234
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

John Paul TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
David S. KUYKENDALL, Defendant-Appellee,
and
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant.

No. 95-7563.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 18, 1996.

John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v. Kuykendall, No. CA-95-1020-R (W.D.Va. Sept. 15, 1995 and Sept. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Appellant's motion to consolidate cases is denied.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

74 F.3d 1234
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

John Paul TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
David S. KUYKENDALL, Defendant-Appellee,
and
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant.

No. 95-7563.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 18, 1996.

John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v. Kuykendall, No. CA-95-1020-R (W.D.Va. Sept. 15, 1995 and Sept. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Appellant's motion to consolidate cases is denied.

AFFIRMED

John Paul Turner v. David S. Kuykendall, and Virginia Department of Corrections, 74 F.3d 1234, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39065, 1996 WL 16818 (4th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

74 F.3d 1234 (John Paul Turner v. David S. Kuykendall, and Virginia Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.