John Paul Turner v. A. Lee Ervin
This text of 74 F.3d 1234 (John Paul Turner v. A. Lee Ervin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
74 F.3d 1234
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
John Paul TURNER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
A. Lee ERVIN, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 95-7583.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 18, 1996.
John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v. Ervin, No. CA-95-1026-R (W.D.Va. Sept. 20 and 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Appellant's motion to consolidate cases is denied.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 F.3d 1234, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39066, 1996 WL 16651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-paul-turner-v-a-lee-ervin-ca4-1996.