John or Jane Doe, in His Official Capacity as the Secretary of the State of Texas, Joe Esparza in His Official Capacity as the Deputy Secretary of the State of Texas, and Ken Paxton , in His Official Capacity as the Attorney General of Texas the State of Texas v. Texas State Conference of of the NAACP, Common Cause Texas, Danyahel Norris, Hyun Ja Norman, Freddy Blanco, Mary Flood Nugent, and Priscilia Bloomquist
This text of John or Jane Doe, in His Official Capacity as the Secretary of the State of Texas, Joe Esparza in His Official Capacity as the Deputy Secretary of the State of Texas, and Ken Paxton , in His Official Capacity as the Attorney General of Texas the State of Texas v. Texas State Conference of of the NAACP, Common Cause Texas, Danyahel Norris, Hyun Ja Norman, Freddy Blanco, Mary Flood Nugent, and Priscilia Bloomquist (John or Jane Doe, in His Official Capacity as the Secretary of the State of Texas, Joe Esparza in His Official Capacity as the Deputy Secretary of the State of Texas, and Ken Paxton , in His Official Capacity as the Attorney General of Texas the State of Texas v. Texas State Conference of of the NAACP, Common Cause Texas, Danyahel Norris, Hyun Ja Norman, Freddy Blanco, Mary Flood Nugent, and Priscilia Bloomquist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-22-00122-CV John or Jane Doe, in His Official Capacity as the Secretary of the State of Style: Texas et al v Texas State Conference of the NAACP et al Date motion filed*: March 8, 2022 Type of motion: Motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief
Is appeal accelerated? No
If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of previous extensions 0 Current Due date: granted: Date Requested:
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ Contrary to appellant’s request to extend the time to file appellant’s brief, no deadline for the filing of appellant’s brief has been set because the complete appellate record has not yet been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Accordingly, we dismiss appellant’s motion as moot.
Judge's signature:____/s/ Sherry Radack_______ Acting individually Acting for the Court
Panel consists of ____________________________________________
Date: _____March 15, 2022____
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
John or Jane Doe, in His Official Capacity as the Secretary of the State of Texas, Joe Esparza in His Official Capacity as the Deputy Secretary of the State of Texas, and Ken Paxton , in His Official Capacity as the Attorney General of Texas the State of Texas v. Texas State Conference of of the NAACP, Common Cause Texas, Danyahel Norris, Hyun Ja Norman, Freddy Blanco, Mary Flood Nugent, and Priscilia Bloomquist, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-or-jane-doe-in-his-official-capacity-as-the-secretary-of-the-state-of-texapp-2022.