John O. Thornton, Jr. v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 25, 2007
Docket07-07-00169-CR
StatusPublished

This text of John O. Thornton, Jr. v. State (John O. Thornton, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John O. Thornton, Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

NO. 07-07-0169-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

JULY 25, 2007 ______________________________

JOHN O. THORNTON, JR., APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE _________________________________

FROM THE 140TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2006-412884; HONORABLE JIM BOB DARNELL, JUDGE _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant John O. Thornton, Jr. filed a pro se notice of appeal from his conviction

for murder and accompanying sentence of life in the Institutional Division of the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice. The certification of right to appeal executed by the trial

court, and signed by appellant's trial counsel, states that "the defendant has waived the

right of appeal." By letter dated May 21, 2007, we notified appellant of this circumstance,

and that the appeal is subject to dismissal based on the certification unless, by June 11, 2007, we were provided an amended certification illustrating that he has the right to appeal

or appellant demonstrates other grounds for continuing the appeal.

On June 12th, the trial court appointed appellate counsel to assist appellant in

determining whether appellant had any rights of appeal. On June 12th, counsel requested

an extension of time to review the record and this court granted that request. On July 5th,

counsel notified this court that, upon review of the plea proceedings, this case was a

negotiated plea bargain which appellant received a life sentence in accordance with the

plea agreement. Further, the trial court did not give appellant the right to appeal any

outstanding issue nor were there any pretrial motions previously ruled upon by the trial

court. Accordingly, we must, and do, dismiss the appeal. TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2(d); See

also Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex.Crim.App. 2006) (we must dismiss

prohibited appeal without further action).

Mackey K. Hancock Justice

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chavez v. State
183 S.W.3d 675 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
John O. Thornton, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-o-thornton-jr-v-state-texapp-2007.