John Michal Arwood v. City of Coral Gables

Eleventh Circuit

John Michal Arwood v. City of Coral Gables

140 F. App'x 927

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedAugust 12, 2005

Docket03-13795

StatusUnpublished

This text of 140 F. App'x 927 (John Michal Arwood v. City of Coral Gables) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

John Michal Arwood v. City of Coral Gables, 140 F. App'x 927 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the district court’s grant of the City of Coral Gables’ motion to dismiss their complaint. After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s well-reasoned order dated May 14, 2003. 1

AFFIRMED.

1

. We reject Appellants’ contention the district court erred by considering facts developed in Allocco v. Coral Gables, 221 F.Supp.2d 1317 (S.D.Fla.2002), aff'd 88 Fed.Appx. 380 (Table) *928 11 1th Cir.2003), in deciding the motion to dismiss, thus converting the motion to dismiss into a summary judgment motion. The district court considered facts from Allocco as they were identical to the allegations in the Arwood complaint or were relevant to the determination of whether there was any set of facts that could enable Appellants to amend their complaint to successfully withstand a motion to dismiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the district court’s grant of the City of Coral Gables’ motion to dismiss their complaint. After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s well-reasoned order dated May 14, 2003. 1

AFFIRMED.

1

. We reject Appellants’ contention the district court erred by considering facts developed in Allocco v. Coral Gables, 221 F.Supp.2d 1317 (S.D.Fla.2002), aff'd 88 Fed.Appx. 380 (Table) *928 11 1th Cir.2003), in deciding the motion to dismiss, thus converting the motion to dismiss into a summary judgment motion. The district court considered facts from Allocco as they were identical to the allegations in the Arwood complaint or were relevant to the determination of whether there was any set of facts that could enable Appellants to amend their complaint to successfully withstand a motion to dismiss.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 F. App'x 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-michal-arwood-v-city-of-coral-gables-ca11-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack